|
Revisions
in Economic Growth Forecast
|
|
Original
|
Revised
|
| GDP
Growth |
3.8
to 4.3%
|
3.3
to 3.8%
|
| GNP
Growth |
4.0
to 4.5%
|
3.8
to 4.3 %
|
| Export
Growth |
4.0%
|
1.0%
|
| Import
Growth |
6.0%
|
3.2%
|
| Peso
vs. the US$ |
47
to 49
|
49
to 50
|
The President's economic formula revolves
around attracting further investments to
create more jobs and stimulate local business
activities through a classic multiplier
effect. Her vision is to make the Philippines
the world's centre of Information Technology
and Communications (ICT), something that
has been derailed for the moment by the
slowdown of the technology sector. Her policy
is to keep relying on the economies of the
United States and Japan to fuel local growth,
despite their weak performance this year.
Overall,
President Arroyo's stated goal is to eradicate
poverty in the Philippines within a decade,
although she knows that she has only three
years left in her present term, something
that signals her desire to seek another term.
While the Constitution grants the president
a single six-year term, President Arroyo is
at present serving out the remaining three-year
term of ousted President Estrada and is therefore
qualified to seek another term in her own
right.
On
the positive side, the Arroyo administration
has been fairly successful in painting an
atmosphere of good governance. Its economic
policies have so far been consistent in attracting
more foreign direct investment. With more
economic reform measures in the offing, the
Arroyo administration hopes to entice foreign
investors with tax breaks and other incentives
that are comparable to those of Singapore,
Malaysia or Thailand.
One
important piece of legislation that recently
excited foreign investors is the Power Restructuring
Act, which seeks to privatize the country's
power industry. This law has set the tone
of the government's approach towards opening
its economy to foreign capital. The country
is now allowing 100 percent foreign ownership
in most industries (except mass media). It
has recently deregulated its oil, banking,
insurance, shipping, telecommunications and
retail trade industries and has removed the
monopoly structures in the market.
Foreign
investors are given the most convenient locations
for their capital. Highly secured and well-equipped
economic zones have been established in different
parts of the country to host the manufacturing
centres and distribution channels of foreign
companies. The country's commercial business
districts (CBDs) now serve regional headquarters
(RHQs) and regional operating headquarters
(ROHQs) of giant multinational firms like
AOL, Caltex, Fluor Daniel, Watson Wyatt, Andersen
Consulting and Procter and Gamble. However,
that being said, the Philippines continues
to grapple with poor infrastructural problems
of which those in the transport and communications
sectors probably impact most severely on foreign
operations in this country.
Despite
the slowdown of the economy, the number of
foreign direct investments is also on the
rise. While the situation can be described
as anything but bullish at this point, its
potential remains strong. Such potential,
however, would not readily translate into
improved economic growth until the government
resolves the single biggest hurdle to development
- the poor peace and order situation.
Such
an atmosphere of political instability, in
tandem with the weakness of the global economy,
is keeping the Philippines from achieving
higher growth rates. After expanding by only
4 percent last year, the gross domestic product
(GDP) of the Philippines is forecast to grow
by only 3.3 to 3.8 percent this year. Even
this is seen in some quarters as an optimistic
target, as the economy expanded by only 3.3
percent in the first half of the year.
For
one thing, this could be seen as good news
for a country, which has just survived two
people's revolts in the span of only five
months. Even the more stable regional economies
such as those of Singapore, Taiwan, and Malaysia
have been in trouble in the past quarter as
a result of the sluggish demand for electronic
products, which make up most of their exports.
In
its initial evaluation mainly based on preliminary
reports from the two sectors, the National
Economic Development Authority (NEDA) said
that the growth of gross domestic product
(GDP) from April to June, which is 3.3 percent,
YoY, and 1.5 percent, QoQ, has also kept the
Philippines out of technical recession. GDP
grew by 2.5 percent, YoY, in the first three
months of the year but contracted by 0.5 percent,
QoQ. Had GDP shrunk, QoQ, in the second quarter
of the year, the economy could have been classified
in technical recession.
Despite
the slump in exports, the economy looks that
it will likely avoid such a technical recession
on the strength of performance of the agriculture
and services sectors. According to NEDA, the
agriculture sector posted a 3 percent growth,
YoY, in the second quarter of the year while
the services sector expanded by 3.8 percent,
YoY, during the period. The industrial sector
grew by 2.7 percent during the quarter.
For
the whole year, the government expects that
the agricultural sector will post a 2.5 to
3.3 percent growth; industry, 1.8 to 2.3 percent;
and services, 4.7 to 5.1 percent. It forecasts
that the GDP will expand by 3.3 to 3.8 percent
this year and by 4.1 to 4.7 percent next year.
Next
year, the government estimates a GDP growth
rate of 4.5 to 5.0 percent, down from the
original projection of 4.9 to 5.5 percent.
The GNP, meanwhile, is expected to grow at
4.8 to 5.3 percent, down from the earlier
target of 5.1 to 5.6 percent.
One
key factor on the restrained expansion of
the Philippine economy is the fiscal deficit
- estimated to be between P145 billion to
P225 billion, which the National Economic
Development Authority (NEDA) admits, will
be hard to manage. A manageable fiscal deficit
is below 2.5 percent of the GNP or 3.9 percent
of the GDP. But even the most optimistic target
of P131-billion deficit represents 4.8 percent
of the GDP. The only immediate recourse would
be bridge financing with the help of the IMF
and the Asian Development Bank (ADB).
President
Arroyo has vowed to "tighten our belts"
and "use money wisely" to plug the
loophole, but such efforts are hampered by
the government's poor tax collection performance.
Both the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR)
and the Bureau of Customs (BOC) have missed
their revenue targets for the semester.
Meanwhile,
the Finance Department claimed that the government
had lost more than P100 billion in uncollected
taxes last year due to leakage in the implementation
of the 10-percent value added tax under the
Comprehensive Tax Reform Program. Finance
Secretary Alberto Romulo blamed the Tax Bureau
for the mess, saying it failed to implement
the tax policies of the government. Aside
from the P100 billion in uncollected taxes,
the finance department also claimed that the
government lost about P124 billion in revenues
because of the tax breaks given to foreign
investments. Trade officials, however, have
a different version on this.
Recently,
foreign investment bank Morgan Stanley Dean
Witter has fingered the Philippines as an
emerging haven for tax evaders. It said the
Philippines needs to overhaul its tax collection
regime as a prelude to any meaningful economic
reform. It blamed distortions caused by tax
perks granted to companies as a major factor
in the government's poor tax collection.
The
investment bank said the country's tax effort
ratio has never exceeded 20 percent and that
the government has lost potential tax revenues
equal to about 10 percent of GNP yearly during
the last 10 years. It added that the country's
savings ratio to GDP last year was only 17.6
percent. In comparison, Singapore's savings
ratio is estimated at 48.2 percent of its
GDP; Malaysia, 41.9 percent; Thailand, 35
percent; and Indonesia, 28.7 percent.
As
a result of the revenue shortfall, the government
is considering borrowing an additional P16
billion this year. It has in fact raised its
borrowing program to P191 billion from an
original P180 billion and faces the prospect
of raising it again during the second half
of the year.
A
big chunk of the national budget is now paid
to offset the annual interests of these debts
which include those of state-owned corporations.
The national government is obligated to pay
some P600 billion (US$11.9 billion) in contingent
liabilities on behalf of these corporations
over the next 20 years. These obligations
cover guarantees extended to government-owned
and controlled corporations and infrastructure
projects.
In
May, the country's total foreign and local
debt soared 15 percent to P2.239 trillion
(approximately US$43.9 billion) from P1.944
trillion (US$38.1 billion) a year earlier,
behind the government's aggressive borrowing
and the depreciation of the peso, which has
lost over 20 percent of its value in the past
12 months. The figure also represents a 3.8
percent increase over the P2.156 trillion
recorded by the end of 2000.
According
to the Bureau of Treasury, the country's domestic
borrowings, accounting for more than half
of the total debt stock, hit P1.147 trillion
in May while the country's foreign obligations
reached P1.091 trillion. The Philippine national
government is said to be borrowing some P7
billion every week from the local private
sector by issuing T-bills and bonds.
Faced
with a burgeoning fiscal deficit, the government
plans to keep borrowing to augment the finances
for infrastructures and services. The government's
budget deficit is expected to reach at least
P145 billion this year and P130 billion next
year. The country had a budget gap of P136
billion last year. Next year, the government
plans to borrow some P267.5 billion, P138.6
billion of which will be sourced from foreign
creditors and P128.8 billion from domestic
financial institutions.
Then,
there is the high inflation rate, which shot
up to 6.5 percent in the first three months
of the year. During the same period last year,
the inflation rate was at a low of 2.6 percent.
The recent increase has been caused primarily
by a rise in the prices of food, beverages
and tobacco as well as in the cost of services.
In times like this, the poorer Filipinos carry
the brunt of high prices of commodities.
The
Arroyo administration proposes a P734-billion
(US$14.83 billion) budget for 2002, 10 percent
higher than this year's P694-billion (US$14.02
billion) allocation. The proposed 2002 budget
is expected to support the government-projected
4.7 percent growth rate in the gross domestic
product (GDP) and an average 5 percent inflation
rate next year. To realize this, the government
is toying with an overhaul of the graft-ridden
Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) and even
replacing it with a totally new tax collection
agency.